C-SUITE PENSION STRATEGIES
  • Home
  • Run On 4 Good
    • Run On 4 Good Pension Funding Strategy For 2025
    • TAS300 V2 trigger for rethink
    • Why You Should Run On 4 Good
    • Surpluses collapse the case for bulk transfers
    • Equity Investor Perspective
    • C-Suite Webinar
    • Members Letters and Questions
  • C-Suiteps Analytics
  • Commentary
  • FD Carol critiques risk transfers
  • Financial Services Growth and Competitiveness Strategy Call for Evidence response
  • DWP consultation response
  • Buy-ins Longevity swaps and other unforced errors
  • The unsustainable esg pensions carve out
  • Case Studies
  • The Team
  • Partnerships
  • Contact

Exercise Discretion:  One Less One More

15/8/2023

 
A Flagship ESG Initiative
Campaign for one year less on life expectancy to mean one more years worth of pension related payments for past and present employees
An Exercise in Discretion to Benefit All Stakeholders
Backdrop
Life expectancy assumptions are coming down further in actuarial tables.  Liabilities will fall by around 3% to 5% for most DB schemes.  Current annual payments to pensioners represent typically around 3% to 5% of assets after recent falls in value (and greater falls in liabilities for the better financially managed).
Trustees and sponsoring employers can decide to distribute additionally benefits to past and present employees in response to changed information.  This is a straight improvement to the scheme’s finances.  The assets are not affected by the assumption changes – as happened when interest rates increased.
Standard industry thinking is to accelerate Risk Transfer Transactions.  Analysis of the real risks and values is needed.

Proposal
Picture
The benefit of discretionary payments can be split.  Increased payments can be made directly to past and present employees.  These comply with tax and legislative requirements.  C-Suite has worked through the detailed requirements.  Sponsoring companies can also benefit from reduced contributions.
The principle of discretionary payments is established.  The time over which they are made and the delivery mechanisms are then scheme specific.  

Campaign Objectives
The objective is to help past and present employees in the tough current economic circumstances.  The over funding of pension liabilities makes this practical.  Sponsors and trustees may then see their pension schemes as Flagship ESG policies not a legacy problem.  That results in having a long term investment strategy for the scheme and having a modernised tier within it.
Pension scheme members and current employees can put the case to sponsors and trustees for “one less one more”
HR as well as finance teams of corporates should take up the opportunity.  Member nominated trustees are particularly relevant.  Here is a break point where intergenerational unfairness is on the agenda and there is an action plan.

Comments are closed.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    April 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    October 2022
    September 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    October 2021
    September 2021
    March 2021
    January 2021
    August 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    September 2019
    June 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    November 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    January 2018
    November 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017

Privacy Notice
C-Suite Pension Strategies Ltd
​Registered in England and Wales
Company No. 09974973
  • Home
  • Run On 4 Good
    • Run On 4 Good Pension Funding Strategy For 2025
    • TAS300 V2 trigger for rethink
    • Why You Should Run On 4 Good
    • Surpluses collapse the case for bulk transfers
    • Equity Investor Perspective
    • C-Suite Webinar
    • Members Letters and Questions
  • C-Suiteps Analytics
  • Commentary
  • FD Carol critiques risk transfers
  • Financial Services Growth and Competitiveness Strategy Call for Evidence response
  • DWP consultation response
  • Buy-ins Longevity swaps and other unforced errors
  • The unsustainable esg pensions carve out
  • Case Studies
  • The Team
  • Partnerships
  • Contact