C-SUITE PENSION STRATEGIES
  • Home
  • Run On 4 Good
    • Run On 4 Good Pension Funding Strategy For 2025
    • TAS300 V2 trigger for rethink
    • Why You Should Run On 4 Good
    • Surpluses collapse the case for bulk transfers
    • Equity Investor Perspective
    • C-Suite Webinar
    • Members Letters and Questions
  • C-Suiteps Analytics
  • Commentary
  • FD Carol critiques risk transfers
  • Financial Services Growth and Competitiveness Strategy Call for Evidence response
  • DWP consultation response
  • Buy-ins Longevity swaps and other unforced errors
  • The unsustainable esg pensions carve out
  • Case Studies
  • The Team
  • Partnerships
  • Contact

Our Response to the Financial Services Growth and Competitiveness Strategy Call for Evidence

Self-belief and confidence about its prospects can be bolstered when worked examples back the strategic aspirations. 
 
That’s the idea set out in C-Suite Pension Strategies’ response to HM Treasury’s Call for Evidence.  Points raised are:

  • The Financial Services Growth and Competitiveness Strategy is based on a well considered analysis.  What is needed straightaway is a worked example to show it will succeed.  Defined Benefit Pension Schemes can provide it.  The financial impact is large and it can be immediate – showing policy statements can be backed with incentives which adjust stakeholder thinking.  A high expectation of well directed regulatory follow up will help all parties recognise what has been achieved and remains expected of them.
​
  • Our response to the Call for Evidence follows up on suggestions already made to DWP on how to align DB schemes with the growth agenda.  A redirection of resources to benefit all stakeholders can be delivered.
​
  • Well funded schemes with strong sponsors can expect to run-on long term with an investment target at over gilts plus 150 basis points.  Surpluses are generated above discount rates used to assess liabilities.
​
  • A key driver is to change the “Fiduciary Duty” assessment of the trustees.  They have a legal expectation to take account of a package of financial incentives from Government; third party guarantees made available and discretionary benefit improvements.
 
  • ​Government monitoring of the actual impact of schemes by its regulators (TPR / FRC / CMA) will highlight what additional resource is becoming available to fund investment for growth and improve market liquidity.  

 “The City and wider financial services sector needs greater confidence and restored self-belief.  It should be expected to deliver more for the economy.  DB bounce back from the derisking overshoot – given impetus by Government policy commitment, incentives and outcome monitoring – can be a great worked example of what the Growth and Competitiveness Strategy can achieve”  William McGrath

Our full Call for Evidence response and supporting documents:
financial_services_growth_and_competitiveness_strategy_call_for_evidence_-_c-suite_pension_strategies_response.pdf
File Size: 371 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

the_unsustainable_esg_pensions_carve_out-nov_2023.pdf
File Size: 1542 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

longevity_swaps_and_buyins_and_other_unforced_errors_ed_ii.pdf
File Size: 2745 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

Privacy Notice
C-Suite Pension Strategies Ltd
​Registered in England and Wales
Company No. 09974973
  • Home
  • Run On 4 Good
    • Run On 4 Good Pension Funding Strategy For 2025
    • TAS300 V2 trigger for rethink
    • Why You Should Run On 4 Good
    • Surpluses collapse the case for bulk transfers
    • Equity Investor Perspective
    • C-Suite Webinar
    • Members Letters and Questions
  • C-Suiteps Analytics
  • Commentary
  • FD Carol critiques risk transfers
  • Financial Services Growth and Competitiveness Strategy Call for Evidence response
  • DWP consultation response
  • Buy-ins Longevity swaps and other unforced errors
  • The unsustainable esg pensions carve out
  • Case Studies
  • The Team
  • Partnerships
  • Contact