C-SUITE PENSION STRATEGIES
  • Home
  • Run On 4 Good
    • Run On 4 Good Pension Funding Strategy For 2025
    • TAS300 V2 trigger for rethink
    • Why You Should Run On 4 Good
    • Surpluses collapse the case for bulk transfers
    • Equity Investor Perspective
    • C-Suite Webinar
    • Members Letters and Questions
  • C-Suiteps Analytics
  • Commentary
  • FD Carol critiques risk transfers
  • Financial Services Growth and Competitiveness Strategy Call for Evidence response
  • DWP consultation response
  • Buy-ins Longevity swaps and other unforced errors
  • The unsustainable esg pensions carve out
  • Case Studies
  • The Team
  • Partnerships
  • Contact

Defined Benefit pension scheme public policy has changed.  Endgame thinking has dated.

29/8/2024

 
DWP Regulations require from September 2024 a Funding and Investment Strategy.  Buyout or buy-in plans require actuaries to provide comparisons of bulk transfers and run-on longer options. Technical Actuarial Standard 300 Version 2 can be transformational. Running-on and providing positive use for surpluses arising is supported by Government.  

The ultra high profits of life insurers from taking over pension schemes is now an issue all should note.  Simply handing money over to them without sufficient analysis is likely to come to be seen as a mistake which reflects badly.

Sponsors are required to be involved in setting the new Funding and Investment Strategy and should be positive.

That work will show:
  • The probabilistic benefit to members of having a life insurer as opposed to the corporate sponsor (with their respective safety nets of PPF and FSCS) is modest and falling.
  • In contrast the upside to sponsor and members of running-on and using surpluses (to improve benefits and reduce or eliminate sponsor pension costs including those for current DC employees) is real and available. 
  • The Board needs a briefing paper covering the financial evolution of the scheme (annotated accounts extracts), summary of where it is now ad the investment strategy currently set.

What can happen next: 

With the company providing such back-up as needed to eliminate trustees’ anxieties the pension professionals have exploited so profitably attractive long term plans can be put in place.

The Board can decide whether its DB scheme can provide a great worked example of its ESG ethos in practice – including generating a competitive advantage of offering improved pension provision, alongside the objective of eliminating pension as a continuing cost to the company.

The Board resets the remit of those directly involved by asking for a long term plan and indicates it can provide the back up needed. 

​Expect trustees to provide a new approach and have your own point person ready to work to put it in place.

A TAS300V2 Case Study

Comments are closed.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    April 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    October 2022
    September 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    October 2021
    September 2021
    March 2021
    January 2021
    August 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    September 2019
    June 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    November 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    January 2018
    November 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017

Privacy Notice
C-Suite Pension Strategies Ltd
​Registered in England and Wales
Company No. 09974973
  • Home
  • Run On 4 Good
    • Run On 4 Good Pension Funding Strategy For 2025
    • TAS300 V2 trigger for rethink
    • Why You Should Run On 4 Good
    • Surpluses collapse the case for bulk transfers
    • Equity Investor Perspective
    • C-Suite Webinar
    • Members Letters and Questions
  • C-Suiteps Analytics
  • Commentary
  • FD Carol critiques risk transfers
  • Financial Services Growth and Competitiveness Strategy Call for Evidence response
  • DWP consultation response
  • Buy-ins Longevity swaps and other unforced errors
  • The unsustainable esg pensions carve out
  • Case Studies
  • The Team
  • Partnerships
  • Contact