C-SUITE PENSION STRATEGIES
  • Home
  • Run On 4 Good
    • Run On 4 Good Pension Funding Strategy For 2025
    • TAS300 V2 trigger for rethink
    • Why You Should Run On 4 Good
    • Surpluses collapse the case for bulk transfers
    • Equity Investor Perspective
    • C-Suite Webinar
    • Members Letters and Questions
  • C-Suiteps Analytics
  • Commentary
  • FD Carol critiques risk transfers
  • Financial Services Growth and Competitiveness Strategy Call for Evidence response
  • DWP consultation response
  • Buy-ins Longevity swaps and other unforced errors
  • The unsustainable esg pensions carve out
  • Case Studies
  • The Team
  • Partnerships
  • Contact

Better Pensions: There for the Asking

6/11/2024

 

Asking trustees and sponsors one question on whether actuaries are complying with Government regulations can change the amount of your pension and the quality of your future pension provision.

“Have the actuaries provided their Technical Actuarial Standard 300 Version 2 Report yet?”

Ask it because:
  • The risk-benefit analysis required by TAS300V2 to compare run-on and risk transfer transactions highlights that most schemes go to “derisk and get rid” strategies are not in members’ or sponsors’ financial interests.
  • The reality is that the risk of a reduced pension is minimal, falling and manageable.  The price paid to get rid is that the upside is sold to a third party (which makes large immediate profits) for nothing.  Exercising discretion is what sponsors and trustees should want to do next in all stakeholders’ interests.
  • At present, money siphoned out of the UK corporates into schemes is in turn being siphoned on to life insurers.  

Members and sponsors need to know these numbers are being considered.  Transparency changes minds.  Numbers talk: 
Picture
Once the numbers are established the governance takes over.  Trustees who do not ask fundamental questions – like assessing whether to hand the assets and liabilities of a Trust over to a third party – risk being in a breach of trust, justiciable by the beneficiaries.  Taking bad advice is probably OK.  Ignoring key subjects is not. 

Trustees and sponsors will be keen to align with new Government policy.  They should then want to ensure members are informed about their new Funding and investment Strategy and how it impacts their Statements of Investment and Funding Principles.

Do not let the sector drift on further with its self-serving Endgames.  Sponsors need to get stuck in to ensure their money and commitment is being used to best effect.  And to have a better pension, what members need to do is ask for one.

Sponsors and trustees should take care to avoid their trusted advisors natural wish to a cover up the track record over recent years.  What schemes need is an informed “heads up” on where they are.  Ask CARO (C-Suite’s Credible Alternatives Reference Organisation) to provide one.  Contact us to find out more.

Comments are closed.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    June 2025
    April 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    October 2022
    September 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    October 2021
    September 2021
    March 2021
    January 2021
    August 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    September 2019
    June 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    November 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    January 2018
    November 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017

Privacy Notice
C-Suite Pension Strategies Ltd
​Registered in England and Wales
Company No. 09974973
  • Home
  • Run On 4 Good
    • Run On 4 Good Pension Funding Strategy For 2025
    • TAS300 V2 trigger for rethink
    • Why You Should Run On 4 Good
    • Surpluses collapse the case for bulk transfers
    • Equity Investor Perspective
    • C-Suite Webinar
    • Members Letters and Questions
  • C-Suiteps Analytics
  • Commentary
  • FD Carol critiques risk transfers
  • Financial Services Growth and Competitiveness Strategy Call for Evidence response
  • DWP consultation response
  • Buy-ins Longevity swaps and other unforced errors
  • The unsustainable esg pensions carve out
  • Case Studies
  • The Team
  • Partnerships
  • Contact